Ward Kendall’s Hold Back This Day is a dystopian science fiction novel about a future in which a totalitarian world government promotes universal miscegenation to eliminate all racial differences — in the name of diversity, of course. Hold Back This Day tells the story of how Jeff Huxton, one white man standing on the brink of our race’s extinction, regained his racial consciousness and pride and began to fight back. Hold Back This Day is a fast-paced, highly entertaining, yet deeply serious and subversive novel of ideas. First published in 2001, Hold Back This Day was written as a prophecy of the 22nd century. Only ten years later, it reads more like a history of our own. Long out of print and fetching ridiculous prices on the used market, Hold Back This Day is now available again in handsome hardcover and trade paperback editions.
These guys are the WN equivalents of Baptist Evangelicals-always cutting open some bird to check the intestines to declare the world is fit for destruction; It's it's not this year, then it's next, and in case that prediction is wrong, well it's definitely happening next year!:rolleyes: This shit's annoying. If they want a race war so fucking badly, why don't they man up and fire the first shots? Download Thomas Chittum's Civil War II book here. Is it a good, interesting read, even if you're not a racialist, WN ideologue? Because I'm interested in reading it, and if not, then it's not a very good book just by only appealing to a niche (Just because WNs usually can't help but make everything about race, when really, everything isn't about race).
Regardless, we'll see. These guys are the WN equivalents of Baptist Evangelicals-always cutting open some bird to check the intestines to declare the world is fit for destruction; It's it's not this year, then it's next, and in case that prediction is wrong, well it's definitely happening next year!:rolleyes: This shit's annoying. If they want a race war so fucking badly, why don't they man up and fire the first shots?
Is it a good, interesting read, even if you're not a racialist, WN ideologue? Because I'm interested in reading it, and if not, then it's not a very good book just by only appealing to a niche (Just because WNs usually can't help but make everything about race, when really, everything isn't about race). Regardless, we'll see. It's a good read even if you aren't an evil racist nazi. The author doesn't like white nationalists. There will be some sort of contention between rural religious type of people and anti-religious urbanites.
For example, with gay marriage coming about that will create an unfair competition with the right of hetro-marriage: not really a problem in large cities populated by urbanites who form families along the homo-line (carefully sterile except maybe a child or two.) However outside of the city and in small towns a lot of people still get married soon after high school and start having children. Why would they want to share the same legal structure with two naturally sterile children. Off topic question for those recommending WN novels. This seems to be a genre that took off after The Turner Diaries. Who is the best WN fiction writer, and who is the most popular? Is it Covington? Is Pierce's Hunter worth reading?
Throwing atheists into the mix is a bit weird. I can't really picture a Richard Dawkins Brigade fighting alongside the Nation of Islam. That configuration of 'enemies' got me wondering about Pratt's 'religious orientation.'
It's hard to tell if he's CI or a Buchananite. That he's able to raise large amounts of money and that he's literate suggests the latter. This article from Rolling Stone from right after Ruby Ridge shows that he's had close ties to CI, the militia movement, and WN for two decades. Armed and Dangerous (The NRA, Militias and White Supremacists are fostering a network of right wing warriors) Rolling Stone Magazine/November 2, 1995 By Leonard Zeskind 'The second amendment ain't about duck hunting,' Larry Pratt began. The crowd of 150 neo-Nazis and self-described Christian patriots laughed. Looking like a slightly rumpled accountant, Pratt, the executive director of the Washington, D.C., organization should be able to own the military assault weapon of his choice - and form a militia to back up his rights.
It was October 1992, and the men - and they were all men - had traveled thousands of miles from more than 14 states, sometimes sleeping in their cars, to Estes Park, Colo., a resort town two hours from Denver, at the eastern entrance to Rocky Mountain National Park. Some of those who attended had already been to jail for their cause, and others were prepared to go. Although many of the participants had met before, this gathering was different. This meeting marked the birth of the modern militia movement that would tie well-armed radicals to gun advocates in a right-wing national network.Sparked by the siege of Randy Weaver's cabin in the Idaho mountains two months earlier, the three-day strategy session was organized by Pete Peters, a dark-haired man with close-set eyes and a mustache who pastors to members of a fringe religious group called Identity. Identity doctrine contends that Northern Europeans are racial descendants of the biblical Hebrews; that our government is in the hands of satanic Jews; and that black people were created before Adam and are therefore less than human. Identity believers have begun to stockpile weapons, food and supplies in preparation for Armageddon, which they think will be a race war in the United States.
Cont'd at: The SPLC suggests the climate today bears similarities to the early 1990s. Would those of you active back then agree?
I consider the SPLC a credible source of analysis, compared to the ADL, for instance, which lets its agenda shape its research conclusions. The furious reaction to the Obama administration’s gun control proposals is reminiscent of the anger that greeted the passage of the 1993 Brady Bill and the 1994 ban on assault weapons supported by another relatively liberal Democrat — Bill Clinton.
The passage of those bills, along with what was seen by the right as the federal government’s violent suppression of political dissidents at Waco, Texas, and Ruby Ridge, Idaho, in the early 1990s, led to the first wave of the Patriot movement that burst into public consciousness with the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. The number of Patriot groups in that era peaked in 1996 at 858, more than 500 groups fewer than the number active in 2012. For many, the election of America’s first black president symbolizes the country’s changing demographics, with the loss of its white majority predicted by 2043.
(In 2011, for the first time, non-white births outnumbered the births of white children.) But the backlash to that trend predates Obama’s presidency by many years. Between 2000 and 2010, the number of hate groups rose from 602 to more than 1,000, where the count remains today. Now that comprehensive immigration reform is poised to legitimize and potentially accelerate the country’s demographic change, the backlash to that change may accelerate as well. While the number of hate groups remained essentially unchanged last year — going from 1,018 in 2011 to 1,007 in 2012 — the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) count of 1,360 Patriot groups in 2012 was up about 7% from the 1,274 active in 2011. And that was only the latest growth spurt in the Patriot movement, which generally believes that the federal government is conspiring to take Americans’ guns and destroy their liberties as it paves the way for a global “one-world government.” From a mere 149 organizations in 2008, the number of Patriot groups shot up to 512 in 2009, jumped again to 824 in 2010, and then skyrocketed to 1,274 in 2011 before hitting their all-time high last year. Now, in the wake of the mass murder of 26 children and adults at a Connecticut school and the Obama-led gun control efforts that followed, it seems likely that that growth will pick up speed once again. In the second half of the article Potok describes developments in the second half of 2012 that substantiate the sentence in read.
Letter from Ward Kendall on the publishing of Hold Back This Day Vanguard News Network Alex Linder, Editor Dear Mr. Linder, I want to thank you and VNN for taking the time to review my novel, Hold Back This Day.
Hood's commentary to be well-balanced, insightful, and entertaining, and wish to thank him as well. Realizing that no novel can be all things to all readers, I am nonetheless greatful that Hold Back This Day has received a largely positive reception. Beatmania online. I do wish to comment on one passage in Mr.
Hood's review, however. It is not a criticism, but merely a clarification. Near the end of the review, Mr. Hood states: At first, it appears a concession on the author's part in order to get the book published.
No mainstream publisher today will produce anything even remotely critical of the Jews or Israel. But it turns out that the book was self-published - no need to worry about offending the Yids. Actually, Hold Back This Day wasn't originally self-published, but was published by Publish America/America House Publishers. This publisher is not a self-publisher, and so I DID 'adjust' my novel so that it would have the best chance of being accepted.
Here's a link to an online sci-fi book reviewer called 'Baryon Book Reviews' where an old review of Hold Back This Day can be found: If you look just under the title and author name, you'll see that the publisher is not IUniverse, but Publish America. So, originally, Hold Back This Day was not a self-published novel. What happened? Well, shortly after Hold Back This Day was published, the founder of Publish America took objection to a website/forum I had created, called 'Writers' Island', which offered a forum for Publish America writers to discuss their work and/or grievances. Anyway, to make a long story short, the publisher objected to what some of its writers were saying in my writers' forum, and told me to shut it down, while at the same time 'freezing' my novel from any further sales until I did.
I even had Ann Crispin (writer of 'Star Wars' novels) come to my aid, via the Science Fiction Writers of America website, but all to no avail. In the end, I was forced to shut down my website in order to regain the rights to Hold Back This Day.
And with no other likely publisher to take on my novel, I decided to self-published it with IUniverse. Now, one other thing: just because Hold Back This Day is self-published, does not mean that the writer is free to say whatever he pleases, in regard to content. I know this to be true, since I wrote IUniverse, and asked them their policy. They replied that IUniverse will not publish 'pornography', 'how-to-make-a-bomb' kind of books, and, lastly, 'racist novels'.
So, again, I had to 'adjust' Hold Back This Day in order to 'slip it through the cracks', so to speak. In other words, if a writer wrote a novel that was overtly anti-black, anti-Jewish, or anti-Mexican, for instance, it would not likely be accepted by IUniverse. In fact, even IUniverse had originally REFUSED to publish Hold Back This Day, since one of their book content reviewers had objected to a certain passage in the novel regarding homosexuals. I either had to remove it, they informed me, or not see the book accepted. That was a hard decision to make, but in the end I felt the racial theme of Hold Back This Day far outweighed the forced removal of an anti-homosexual passage. So, I complied, and Hold Back This Day made it through the PC gauntlet - but just barely.
The lesson here is this: Not even self-published books have absolute free speech, a point I wanted Mr. Hood to be aware of. It is no criticism of him at all, since he had no way of knowing these 'behind the scenes' facts before he read Hold Back This Day or wrote his excellent review. Sincerely, Ward Kendall author of Hold Back This Day WARD KENDALL.
With all that happened recently at the Wisconsin State Fair, it’s time to re-read Walter E Williams’ column from a while back titled “America’s New Racists”. The late South African economist William Hutt, in his 1964 book, “The Economics of the Colour Bar,” said that one of the supreme tragedies of the human condition is that those who have been the victims of injustices and oppression “can often be observed to be inflicting not dissimilar injustices upon other races.” Born in 1936, I’ve lived through some of our openly racist history, which has included racist insults, beatings and lynchings. Tuskegee Institute records show that between the years 1880 and 1951, 3,437 blacks and 1,293 whites were lynched. I recall my cousin’s and my being chased out of Fishtown and Grays Ferry, two predominantly Irish Philadelphia neighborhoods, in the 1940s, not stopping until we reached a predominantly black North or South Philly neighborhood. Today all that has changed.
Most racist assaults are committed by blacks. What’s worse is there’re blacks, still alive, who lived through the times of lynching, Jim Crow laws and open racism who remain silent in the face of it. Last year, four black Skidmore College students yelled racial slurs while they beat up a white man because he was dining with a black man. Skidmore College’s first response was to offer counseling to one of the black students charged with the crime. In 2009, a black Columbia University professor assaulted a white woman during a heated argument about race relations. Wago eds file download. According to interviews and court records obtained and reported by Denver’s ABC affiliate (12/4/2009), black gangs roamed downtown Denver verbally venting their hatred for white victims before assaulting and robbing them during a two-month crime wave.
Ward Kendall
Download kumpulan lagu barat terbaru. Earlier this year, four black girls beat a white girl at a McDonald’s, and the victim suffered a seizure. Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel ordered an emergency shutdown of the beaches in Chicago because mobs of blacks were terrorizing families. According to the NBC affiliate there (6/8/2011), a gang of black teens stormed a city bus, attacked white victims and ran off with their belongings.
Racist black attacks are not only against whites but also against Asians. In San Francisco, five blacks beat an 83-year-old Chinese man to death. They threw a 57-year-old woman off a train platform. Two black Oakland teenagers assaulted a 59-year-old Chinese man; the punching knocked him to the ground, killing him. At Philly’s South Philadelphia High School, Asian students report that black students routinely pelt them with food and beat, punch and kick them in school hallways and bathrooms as they hurl racial epithets such as “Hey, Chinese!” and “Yo, Dragon Ball!” The Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund charged the School District of Philadelphia with “deliberate indifference” toward black victimization of Asian students. In many of these brutal attacks, the news media make no mention of the race of the perpetrators. If it were white racist gangs randomly attacking blacks, the mainstream media would have no hesitation reporting the race of the perps.
Eternity Beach
Editors for the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times and the Chicago Tribune admitted to deliberately censoring information about black crime for political reasons. Chicago Tribune Editor Gerould Kern recently said that the paper’s reason for censorship was to “guard against subjecting an entire group of people to suspicion.” These racist attacks can, at least in part, be attributed to the black elite, who have a vested interest in racial paranoia. And that includes a president who has spent years aligned with people who have promoted racial grievance and polarization and appointed an attorney general who’s accused us of being “a nation of cowards” on matters of race and has refused to prosecute black thugs who gathered at a Philadelphia voting site in blatant violation of federal voter intimidation laws. Tragically, black youngsters — who are seething with resentments, refusing to accept educational and other opportunities unknown to blacks yesteryear — will turn out to be the larger victims in the long run. Black silence in the face of black racism has to be one of the biggest betrayals of the civil rights struggle that included black and white Americans. Taken from Walter E.
Williams — Dr. Williams serves on the faculty of George Mason University as John M. Olin Distinguished Professor of Economics and is the author of More Liberty Means Less Government: Our Founders Knew This Well. PART 1: PART 2: Furthermore, it is clear that the leftist-controlled media, the US government, the FBI, Homeland Security, and every other entity long designed to crush any and all resistance to the multicultural conversion of America into a brown, Third World employment pool of low-paid, liberal-voting drones will ever be allowed – BY LAW – to alter or change that Machiavellian goal. What is needed is to shun what has not worked before, combined with a new paradigm of strategy – a strategy that can launch whites towards a last chance at survival.
Ward Kendall author of 'Hold Back This Day' Amazon.com. PART 1: 'The American Third Position believes that government policy in the United States discriminates against whites, and that whites need their own political party to fight this discrimination.' As a writer who has dealt with the issue of Race in America for over fifteen years, there is no doubt whatsoever that the US government knowingly discriminates against whites throughout the entire socio-political infrastructure of our nation. That stated, no political party that is based on 'race' – especially one that is based on the interests of the white race – will ever be more than a 'Nazi party' in the eyes of most whites (except for a small minority). Ward Kendall author of 'Hold Back This Day' Amazon.com.
Time for whites to demand 'equal justice'. Our adversaries have hijacked phrases that only members of their inner-circle can use (aka non-whites, liberals).
It is time we start using those words, because those are the words that best describe our situation and what we need. We need true justice for white Americans. It is high-time we end privileges for communities based on skin color. We need to address crimes equally.
Hate crime laws are not universally applied. Whites must demand more from our politicians and the media.
Only when we use a meaningful dialogue, will we be able to confront the racism and crimes happening against white Americans. 'Editors for the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times and the Chicago Tribune admitted to deliberately censoring information about black crime for political reasons.' All these publications as well as most of mainstream media is owned by Jews who have a vested interest in playing one race against the other so they may rule. It isn't that they are being politically correct if you see how the media has been used as the first weapon before mass destruction worldwide followed. The evil hand behind the media wants nothing but a civil war so that the globalist Jew may introduce more Patriot law on the pretext of law and order with the real hidden motive of wiping out any opposition. I for one has given up reading the mainstream media. Long Live Internet.
What's really disturbing about this violent behavior against whites by blacks, is that in the minds of many blacks, this is not even considered 'racism'. Some so-called black intellectuals have taught their race that such actions on the part of blacks against whites is just a reaction to historical racist actions against them, or rather their ancestors, or, they have this just silly a notion that because whites out number blacks and supposedly hold power in this country, that they're actions are incompatable with what we and most normal and common sense individuals would call racism. Of course all of this is just more excuses to avoid taking personal responsiblity for thier behavior. Unfornately blacks like Walter Williams and his view on this problem is rare, and we can't expect things to get any better if we allow ourselves to become a minority in this country. If anything, we can look to be treated as many White South Africans have been treated since the fall of apartheid in that country, which hasn't been good. Many scholars have pointed out that the jewish involvement in the slave trade is underplayed.
Even the jewish community does not discuss their involvement in the Atlantic slave trade, therefore, the jewish community is unfairly excluded from the discussion. When one thinks about it, there were few Europeans who had ships or access to ships. Spain was the master of the sea and jewish merchants financed the shipping. Of course, one never hears about the 'white' slave trade known as 'white slavery'.
I found Hold Back This Day to be very timely, considering both Europe and North America are under demographic siege by swarming hordes of illegal aliens and so-called “refugees”. Kendall’s novel is set a hundred years from now, after the West has capitulated (which they are in the process of doing now) and what’s left over is a world lain waste by multiculturalism, race-mixing, and leftist policies that have destroyed the last vestiges of freedom and innovation.
It’s like Orwell’s “1984”, except I found Hold Back This Day to be very timely, considering both Europe and North America are under demographic siege by swarming hordes of illegal aliens and so-called “refugees”. Kendall’s novel is set a hundred years from now, after the West has capitulated (which they are in the process of doing now) and what’s left over is a world lain waste by multiculturalism, race-mixing, and leftist policies that have destroyed the last vestiges of freedom and innovation. It’s like Orwell’s “1984”, except Kendall’s version is much grimmer, and much more likely to happen. If you like dark tales, told with relentless pace, then “Hold Back This Day” is the book for you. It’s dystopia on steroids.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |